Ideas before they harden into argument
These posts occupy the space between first observation and formal publication — written with the same care, without the constraints of an external platform.
On the limits of consensus in academic writing
Why peer-reviewed consensus can calcify an argument before it has been properly tested — and what that means for how we cite and are cited.
Conference talks as a drafting tool
Speaking to an expert audience before the article is finished is not a shortcut — it is the most efficient form of peer review available outside the journal.
Distributed publication and the coherent voice problem
Publishing across platforms fragments the record. This post examines whether a portfolio site restores coherence or merely creates a second layer of curation.
The formal record is elsewhere
These posts develop arguments that reach their final form in peer-reviewed articles and conference presentations. Follow the published work for the complete case.